Process evaluation of the New Orleans Intervention Model for infant mental health in Glasgow Working with infants and their carers after abuse and neglect
The Chief Scientist Office in Scotland has funded an exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing two new services for maltreated infants and children who have come into local authority care:
- NSPCC's Glasgow Infant Family Team (GIFT) - a multidisciplinary infant mental health team delivering the New Orleans Intervention Model of assessment and intervention
- Family Assessment and Contact Team (FACS) - a social work service delivering enhanced version of assessments.
Both services help professionals and judges decide whether young children should return to their birth families or have a permanent alternative such as adoption.
We asked the University of Glasgow to undertake a qualitative evaluation of perceptions and experiences of GIFT, how it fitted within existing service and decision making networks and how it compares to the FACS service. This ran alongside the RCT. The researchers investigated how key features of GIFT impact on the wider system and barriers to implementation. This report is part of our Impact and evidence series.
Authors: Fiona Turner-Halliday, Nicholas Watson and Helen Minnis
Interviews and focus groups were conducted with trial participants including GIFT and FACS professionals, birth parents and foster carers.
The mental health component of GIFT
- Participants viewed the mental health focus of GIFT as a positive addition to the assessment and treatment of infants and families after abuse and neglect.
- There was a perception that GIFT could have more influence (termed by researchers as the GIFT 'clout') than 'services as usual' in decision-making about the future of infants in care.
- However, as the evidence generated by GIFT is perceived as more influential, some social workers felt this undermined their assessments in cases where there were differences of opinion.
- GIFT, like FACS, typically follows a 3 month assessment model. Unlike FACS, GIFT then provides 6 to 9 months of treatment.
- Participants felt the treatment phase was necessary to improve the quality of evidence in a case and therefore the accuracy of decision-making.
- There were concerns about GIFT's longer timescales when working with parents who
- struggle to achieve change in the first place
- are unable to sustain change following treatment.
- GIFT's timescales do not fit with the timings of social work permanence reviews.
- The current legal framework does not fit with or support the longer GIFT timescales.
GIFT's work with foster carers
- Foster carers appreciated GIFT's thorough assessment which supported them in understanding the child's needs. It is a level of support they had never received before.
- Some foster carers found that their involvement in GIFT challenging and time-consuming.
- Working with foster carers took more resources than anticipated partly because of significant variation in the quality of emotional care they provided and their commitment to the process.
- GIFT highlights the challenge of working in a system where many foster carers are not registered as prospective adopters, known as dual-registration, so the service is unable to work with the children's future carers.
|Summary and conclusions||61|
"When you do have a case like that with a child who has got additional needs, things can be masked, like her development. GIFT had picked up on the clinical side of it, which has gave us a much better and thorough assessment."
Area team social worker
Please cite as: Turner-Halliday, F., Watson, N. and Minnis, H. (2016) Process evaluation of the New Orleans Intervention Model for infant mental health in Glasgow.
Impact and evidence series
Our evaluation and research reports that look at the impact of our services or summarise the evidence about what works to protect children from abuse and neglect.
New Orleans Intervention Model
Impact and evidence hub
Find out how we evaluate and research the impact we’re making in protecting children, get tips and tools for researchers and access resources.
Looking after infant mental health: our case for change
Taking Care evaluation
Reunification: an evidence-informed framework for return home practice
Evaluation report on implementing the reunification practice framework
Achieving emotional wellbeing for looked after children: a whole system approach
Solution-focused practice toolkit
New Orleans Intervention Model
Face to Face
Coping with Crying
Looking after infant mental health
Children in care
Child protection in the UK
Child abuse and neglect
Our Current Awareness Service for Practice, Policy And Research delivers free weekly email alerts to keep you up-to-date with all the latest safeguarding and child protection news.
How safe are our children? conference 2017
How safe are our children? is the NSPCC’s annual flagship conference for everyone working in child protection.
Follow us on Twitter and keep up-to-date with all the latest news in child protection.
We hold the UK's largest collection of child protection resources and the only UK database specialising in published material on child protection, child abuse and child neglect.
New in the Library
A free weekly email listing all of the new child protection publications added to our library collection.
Helping you keep children safe
Read our guide for professionals on what we do and the ways we can work with you to protect children and prevent abuse and neglect.
Impact and evidence hub
Get expert training and consultancy
Sharing knowledge to keep children safe
Read our guide to the NSPCC Knowledge and Information Service to find out how we can help you with child protection queries, support your research, and help you learn and develop.